What's wrong with this picture?
Posted by Doug Wed, 13 Apr 2005 16:27:00 GMT
Police “stealing” people’s identity for a girl to work undercover as a stripper. I just can’t figure out what it is about this story that offends me the most. Is it:- that police paid a Criminal Justice student $100 a night over three months to strip?
- that police spent three months in a strip club watching her strip while looking for liquor violations?
- the nonchalant and somewhat confused quote from an officer that says the girl seemed ashamed of what she was doing?
- that the police ultimately charged the girl with crimes involving the sting operation?
- that the County Prosector Gary Nasal excuses the whole thing because, “the result speaks for itself”? (As if the ends justifies the means?)
- or maybe that police twice used someone else’s identity as part of their operation;
- once taking a living person’s driver’s license and giving it to the girl to use as her name while stripping.
- once taking a dead person’s ID to register for a web site where they could further monitor the stripping on-line.
- or could it be that an Ohio anti-identity-theft law gives law enforcement permission to use a person’s identity in the course of an investigation?